>>36336331

>>36336342
perfect time for my internet to be really slow...

>>36336374

>>36336314
Judging from the first pic there, I have a nice, illicit blue-board wank to look forward to.

>>36336314
what happens?
I'll ask if it was even finished past what looked like the draft stage and when chapter 2 is coming out.

that's what I know will happen, whatever else happens is for whoever else to decide.

>>36336381
probably not as much as you would think

>>36336380

>>36336387
all good questions, I think someone's working on a different take.

>>36336427

>>36336434

>>36336449
>>36336434

>>36336464

Have you ever had that strange feeling in your gut when someone brings up a project you made months or years ago? It's like, "hey I remember that" followed by "oh fuck look at all these things I need to fix, Christ" followed by "who am I kidding, I'm never going to fix/finish this".

>>36336387

There's only one chapter and it's storyboards. I would like to see other people make /co/nrad-based comics though.

>>36336427
uh-huh...

also, GIANT ROBOT HANDS will happen.

>>36336496

You wrote this OP?

Good Shit

>>36336503
more than a few would like to see it finished or continued.

I've seen some other comics and know a few more are planned by someone.
http://psuedofolio.tumblr.com/post/21543296658
>I think this /co/ comic is actually happening. Brace yourselves.

>>36336538
Actually, that would be this fella who just popped up in the thread.
>>36336503
Man, I do love your stuff. Been thinkin bout doing a /co/lette comic recently, and remembered this established bit of fun. I'd be going a pretty different direction though.

>>36336601

>>36336618

>>36336642

I always thought there were at least two /co/lettes, one was /ck/ when she was in her late teens/early 20s (before opening up a dinner and marrying /co/nrad), and another one that I don't really know the back story of.

it's like how there's multiple Robins.

>>36336503
Don't want to seem intrusive, but I thought you'd left the internet, or stopped drawing or some such?

Granted I really liked your work so if you are starting to draw for the internet again then I'd consider that to be good news.

>>36336653

>>36336503
I know that feeling very well. Kinda nice in a nostalgic way.

>>36336675

>>36336704

>>36336719
Now that I think on it, this could probably fit in Pulp

>>36336740

>>36336757

>>36336770

>>36336778

Dun duun duuuunnn.

So who is this kid anyway?

>>36336673
There never was any kind of "official" backstory for /Co/lette. She was a product of a /co/ thread putting together a frankenstein's monster of traits that they found attractive in /co/-related female characters.
She doesn't belong to anybody, so nobody can really say what's "canon" and what's not. Sometimes communal characters like this can get an "official" story by consensus, but I think that sort of consensus would be impossible to ever achieve on 4chan.

proceeding with other arts

fluffy

ics

That feel when you commissioned an artist to draw a fetish fuel picture of /Co/lette, only for his paypal account to get frozen and terminated due to "suspicious activity" right after. And so both the artist and you are screwed out of the money, meaning you can expect to never see it happen...

king cheetah

>>36336887
what was the pic?

so many /co/ creation superheroes and other characters to pull from.

one more for the road

>>36336887
>>36336920
Not really explicit, but a hypnofetishy thing involving /Co/lette and the female version of the /Co/llector.

>>36337132
You mean this lady?

>>36337165
yes

>>36336805
>So who is this kid anyway?

The comic's version of /m/.

>>36336719

Also featured - /an/, /ic/, /cg/, /v/

>>36337204
ah, cool. Always liked how this comic had 4chan as the cast.

>>36336822
there's a few comics made giving her some backstory.

Varies each time, only consistent thing is that she's a nerd.

surprisingly little porn...

>>36337392
wouldn't be able to post it on /co/ anyway.

Who did that comic? Endpiece?

>>36337132
if you can describe it, and it's not too graphic, I might be able to draw it up for ya a little later.

thank you for starting this thread.

>>36337555
It wasn't anything major, it was based around the image in >>36337202 and funny thing is it was kind of a misunderstanding on my part of what the picture was supposed to be. I figured that the card in that picture was supposed to like one of the Mad Hatter's cards from Batman with the mind control circuitry and such.
So the concept was /Co/llector having just placed such a card behind /Co/lette's ear. I don't remember the exact pose I was suggesting, but the idea was to get the "under control" or "lights on, no one home" idea across. I think I hadn't quite decided whether I would rather have her with the bolt upright, standing at attention and staring blankly kind of entranced, or slumped backwards with /Co/llector sort of holding her up a little. I did have the idea that /Co/llector would have one hand to the side of /Co/lette's face, caressing her cheek or maybe doing the supporting her thing. Just for puns sake, the words "Assuming Direct /Co/ntrol" could be worked in as a title or image name somewhere.

for anyone not already aware, there is a whole site dedicated to this kind of stuff.

http://www.4chanhouse.org/

>>36337874
That's none too bad. I might be able to swing one by, after work.

I'd like to see more comics about these characters.

Not just /co/nrad and /co/lette, but new comics featuring the other board-tans as well.

>>36339359

Anyone except the /mlp/-tan.

>>36339444
I want to see the fic of her being raped by /d/ drawn though.

Ya know, I don't have nearly as much /co/nrad art as I do /co/lette stuff.

you know, I think this is the only one of /s/ I've seen.

>>36339703
there's a lot of it out there though.

bump

>>36340398
People tend to draw boards they interact with more.

I always liked Endpiece's version of /co/lette best. Here's another doodle I did of her previously.

>>36337392
Amen to that.
http://rule34.paheal.net/post/view/504317

Don't know if thread is still alive or not
But here comes some more /co/lette and /co/nrad stuff

bring it on

>/co/ has comics
>/v/ couldn't even finish broquest, or the board-tan fighting game

Yes, that just happen

>>36347190
>>36347190

How far along is BroQuest, anyway?

>>36345460
I just realized that one of these girls is /s/

>>36337204
>comic's version of /m/
Is there any more of this character?

>>36347190
well it is a video game

>>36347510
Last I checked on their blog, they were enlisting more help.

For my own two cents, I love @$$'s take a whole heck of a lot.

I'd like to see a comic of An/diy/ trying to help /co/nrad build something.

Like a shelf and it turns into something completely different, like a hang glider or automatic pie throwing machine.

>>36347698

http://1d4chan.org/wiki/Board-tans/m

Wonderful stuff. Engaging characters. Leaves me yearning for more.

>>36347877
The problem with that character is that it is what /m/ wants to be, as apposed to what /m/ is.
>>36336805 feels a bit more accurate, as /m/ seems to be unsure of himself, which not only is more accurate, but also makes for a far more interesting character.

>>36348055
>The problem with that character is that it is what /m/ wants to be, as apposed to what /m/ is.

Aren't most of the board-tans prone to that, being the result of design-by-committee (mostly /co/ deciding what traits a board should have)?

>>36348260
True, but honestly the musclebound version of /m/ doesn't feel all that interesting.

>>36348363
That, and with this version, we can have /co/m/ss/.

>>36348260
I believe many boards do not really like their board-tans.
Though many of them don't really give a crap about the project.

/x/ didn't like the idea of theirs being a half naked basement dweller.

/tg/ didn't like how overweight theirs was at fist, so now he looks anorexic.

/co/'s turned from the guy wearing the green lantern jacket to /co/nrad full time.

I wish I could've saved some of the pics from the shit storm on /v/ when /vg/ was made.

It was fun watching /mlp/ argue for 2 weeks over what theirs should look like though.

I don't really think too many give enough fucks to try and change them.
I know /u/ did, and that's how it got lesbian twins.

>>36348570
But if it's mainly /co/ who is working with the characters, shouldn't the final decision lie with who are actually going to make stories with these characters?

More adventures in general would be nice

Ok time to pic bump somemore

>>36348900
Makes sense to me. In all honestly it's really about the one or three people making comics to take the information that's being thrown out there to make compelling narratives or interesting vignettes. So it's maybe even less just about /co/ making them, as it is whoever's doing the heavy lifting of making the dang things.

>>36348917
I agree with this

>>36348900
/co/ hasn't done much in the way of new stuff with the characters in awhile + it's really more about whoever decides to use them to make a story.

The biggest amount of board-tan discussion so far this year has been on /mlp/ during the past couple weeks, and /co/, as a board, wanted no part of it.

/tg/ has done a ton of work on the board-tan project as well, and every so often some other board will become just interested enough to make up their own board-tan instead of settling for one being made for them by people who may or may not frequent the board the character is supposed to represent.

I'm surprised no one made more rule 63 of them all

>>36347190
>>36347705
Yeah, making a game is a whole lot more complicated then a comic.

>>36348570
I suppose that's always been something of an issue in the whole "board-tans" thing. Should the character represent the board as they ideally would like to see themselves/their group, or as they actually are?

/Co/lette is definitely an "as we wish we could be," although /Co/nrad at least tends to have some more awkward or pathetic elements to his character when he isn't fighting crime.

anymore of /w/ and /wg/?

>>36349316
I've often wondered if making threads on a few of the other boards to ask them about it would be considered as spam or not.

I know /a/ would just sage bomb a thread like that (that's all /a/ ever seems to be doing).

Don't know if it'd be against the rules in /d/ since it's got that "no western shit allowed" rule,

/v/ hates everything,

and all the other boards seem like it'd be considered too far off topic except maybe /tg/.

>>36349498
I think the muscular /m/ was made with the input of an /m/ thread.

Bump

>>36349825
really?

huh, guess it wasn't through enough to leave a lasting impact then.

>>36350805
oooh, I rather like this redesign

>yfw /co/lette cameo in Skull Girls

>>36351153
that'd be nice, it's not as if we don't have ways inside.

>>36351501
>>36348917
for anyone who doesn't know.

>>36351153
>She becomes a new skin or outfit for Cerebella
>It would be her dress up as /Co/lette but her hat will have the robotic arms
Yeah that would be cool

/co/, why haven't you been working on your art?

>that feel when you were here in the original /co/lette thread

I feel old now, goddamn.

>>36354602
any particular feature you were responsible for?